Is the Coronavirus crisis benefiting the environment? - Is the Coronavirus crisis benefiting the environment? - Network - Tourist

Network

Welcome to the TOURIST network, the knowledge exchange space for experts and stakeholders in the challenging fields of sustainability in tourism and innovative financial management strategies. The network facilitates international cooperation in order to widen similar horizons with new helpful perspectives and inspiring developments focusing on core topics resulting from burning questions of the network members.

Become a creative member of this co-learning space in order to share and co-develop up-to-date questions and helpful knowledge or practical solutions.

Please or Register to create posts and topics.

Is the Coronavirus crisis benefiting the environment?

The Coronavirus will improve people´s perception of sustainable tourism, and people will focus more on sustainable ways of traveling in the future?
Yes - in the short run
Yes - in the long run
No - people will behave the same as before

These weeks we are witnessing how nature is returning to its original shape. It happens for the first time, that popular and always crowded tourist destinations are bringing back to its former glory. Venice is clean again! The canals in Venice are so still, dolphins and swans are returning for the first time in years.

Recent satellite images from NASA of China also showed less air pollution amid the country’s economic shutdown, due to less transportation and manufacturing. History suggests that global catastrophes, especially those with major effects on the economy, tend to drive a short decline in carbon emissions. The 2008 recession, for instance, was accompanied by a temporary drop in global carbon emissions.

What do you think? Is coronavirus inadvertently cleaning our planet? What are the possible implications? How the virus will affect tourism and perception of sustainability tourism?

Best regards,
Adis
ImageImage

Adis Krdzalic

FH Joanneum

Institut für Bank und Versicherungswirtschaft

adis.krdzalic@fh-joanneum.at

Thanks, Adis, for initiating this little research. We should try to make a bit publicity for it...

I will link it to other issues which might fit to this!

Bye, Harry

Ceterum censeo mutationem climae esse vincendem.

(Incidentally, I think that global warming must be defeated) 

 

Prof. (FH) Mag. Mag. Dr. Harald A. Friedl
Assoc. Professor for Sustainability and Ethics in Tourism
Institute for  Health and Tourism Management
FH JOANNEUM - University of Applied Sciences
Kaiser-Franz-Josef-Straße 24
8344 Bad Gleichenberg, Austria
Phone office +43-316/5453-6725
Phone mobil: +43-699/191.44.250
eMail: harald.friedl@fh-joanneum.at
Web: www.fh-joanneum.at/GMT

 

By protecting and restoring nature and its ecosystems, we protect and restore ourselves. This situation with the corona virus should change our perception about the nature and ecosystem.

https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-56042029

Adis Krdzalic

FH Joanneum

Institut für Bank und Versicherungswirtschaft

adis.krdzalic@fh-joanneum.at

Dear Adis, thanks a lot, this article you metion is worth to quote:

Bill Gates: Solving Covid easy compared with climate  https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-56042029

By Justin Rowlatt

One issue Gates talks about is...

2px presentational grey line

Private jets permitted

Simply consuming less stuff - fewer flights, local food, less electricity and gas - won't solve the problem.

"India is going to build housing for their people, provide lighting at night, air conditioning to make conditions liveable," Mr Gates believes, so global demand will not reduce.

He argues political action is more important, demanding government do the right thing, and, using our voices as consumers, insisting the same of companies.

"If you buy an electric car, a hamburger made of a meat substitute, an electric heat pump for your home you are helping increase the production of these products and therefore helping drive prices down."

Mr Gates still enjoys the trappings of the billionaire lifestyle.

He uses private jets, but insists that they are powered by biofuels - aviation fuels made from plant products.

"I pay three times as much now for my aviation fuel, you know, over $7m [£5m] a year in all my offset spending."

And he has joined a £3bn bidding war to buy one of the world's largest private jet services companies, a business called Signature Aviation.

Is that appropriate when you've just written a book telling the world how to avoid a climate disaster?

"I don't think getting rid of flying would make sense," he replies. "That type of brute force technique won't get us there."

He says the answer has to be "a type of aviation fuel that doesn't cost much extra and is zero emission and that's got to be biofuels or electric fuels or perhaps using green hydrogen to power the plane".

 

My comment: Interestingly, this is something Paul Peeters, Professor Sustainable Transport and Tourism at Breda University of Applied Sciences, is arguing and doing research about. With the same price it won't be feasable, as aviation kerosine is heavily subsidized at the moment as there is not tax at all on it...

 

Ceterum censeo mutationem climae esse vincendem.

(Incidentally, I think that global warming must be defeated) 

 

Prof. (FH) Mag. Mag. Dr. Harald A. Friedl
Assoc. Professor for Sustainability and Ethics in Tourism
Institute for  Health and Tourism Management
FH JOANNEUM - University of Applied Sciences
Kaiser-Franz-Josef-Straße 24
8344 Bad Gleichenberg, Austria
Phone office +43-316/5453-6725
Phone mobil: +43-699/191.44.250
eMail: harald.friedl@fh-joanneum.at
Web: www.fh-joanneum.at/GMT